I have tyres manufactured in multiple factories how do I combine that in one product passport
One passport per tyre, linked to the factory that made it
A product passport belongs to one product, produced in one place under one responsibility — not to a range. If the same tyre type is manufactured in multiple factories, that means in practice multiple passports: one per factory, per production location or per production variant, depending on where the data actually differs. The data that can vary per factory — composition, test results, raw material origin — belong to that specific factory. What is the same across all factories, such as the model number or general product description, can be shared, but the combination of factory plus product determines which passport belongs to which tyre.
For whom this is relevant, and for whom it is not
This applies to companies that have tyres manufactured under their own brand or specification by multiple suppliers, or that source the same tyre type from different factories to ensure supply security. It does not apply to a wholesaler who resells ready-made, already-passported tyres: they receive the passport already provided and have nothing to assemble. A manufacturer with a single production location does not face this issue either: there the link between product and factory is self-evident. The subject becomes especially relevant for those who act themselves as an importer or brand owner and are responsible for assembling the passport from data coming from different sources. Whether a tyre is subject to the obligation at all is described on the page on whether the product passport applies to your tyres; that is an earlier question than how to combine multiple factories.
The date is not yet fixed; the system is
When the product passport for tyres becomes mandatory is not yet determined. The ESPR itself (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) is the framework law; the specific obligation for tyres comes via a delegated act drawn up specifically for this product group. That act does not yet exist for tyres. More explanation of what a delegated act precisely is and why it is decisive for the date is on the page on delegated acts. Until that act is published, what is already certain is that the ESPR prescribes a system in which the passport per product is linked to a responsible actor in the supply chain (Article 38 of the ESPR). That system will not change, even though the entry date for tyres is still open. Once that date is known, this page will be updated; a general overview of the expected timeline is on the page on when the passport becomes mandatory.
How this is approached in practice
The first step is to check whether the tyres from the different factories are truly identical, or whether there are differences in composition, test data or raw material origin. Often the latter is the case, even if the end product looks identical to the customer. The second step is to request a separate dataset per factory: not one general set for the entire range, but a set demonstrably belonging to that specific production location. What data exactly that is is described on the page on what you request from your supplier. The third step is to document that delivery to each factory separately, so it is clear who supplies which data and when — this is best done when drawing up or renewing the purchase contract, as explained on the page on agreements in the purchase contract. The fourth step is to verify the data before it enters a passport, which is especially relevant when multiple factories supply data independently and mutual differences do not always become apparent immediately; see the page on verifying data. Only once these steps have been completed can a passport be assembled per factory that matches what is actually being produced.
This follows from: Article 38 and Article 10 of the ESPR
Article 38 of the ESPR describes the requirements for actors in the supply chain and thereby places responsibility for data accuracy with the party supplying that data — which means that data must remain traceable to that factory per factory. Article 10 of the ESPR describes the requirements for the digital product passport itself, including that the passport is linked to a specific product or product model; a factory that differs in composition or production process thereby also affects the content of the passport. For those sourcing tyres from outside the EU, the role of the importer comes into play: Article 29 of the ESPR describes the obligations of importers, and Article 15 of the ESPR describes customs controls on the digital product passport — relevant when different factories are located outside the EU. More about that situation is on the page on imports from outside the European Union.
Anyone already working with multiple factories can best start by mapping out which data actually differs per factory and document that in purchasing agreements, so that the passport — once the obligation for tyres comes into effect — can be compiled per factory without rush when the time comes.
What this is based on
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 38 (requirements for actors in the supply chain)
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 10 (requirements for the digital product passport)
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 15 (customs checks concerning the digital product passport)
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 29 (obligations of importers)
The regulation itself is available on EUR-Lex. We provide references per statement; you do not have to take our word for it.
What you must do concretely
What is expected of you
Producing tyres from multiple factories under one own brand or specification is in the tyre industry more the rule than the exception. If you do that, you face a practical question with the digital product passport: is that one passport per tyre type, or must each factory location deliver something separately? The ESPR reasons from the product and the actors in the supply chain, not from the production location as such.
Each manufacturing address provides its own data
Article 38 of the ESPR describes the requirements for actors in the supply chain: each party that contributes to the product provides the information that falls within its role. For a company of 10 to 100 employees having tyres made at multiple factories, this means that each factory in principle provides its own production data, materials and test results — even if the end result for the customer is one and the same tyre name or specification. Practically, it is important to know per factory which data it registers itself and which must come from you as the contracting party. What data must I request from my tyre supplier? provides an overview for this that can be repeated per manufacturing location.
The passport must be correct in content, per product model
Article 10 describes the requirements for the digital product passport itself: it must contain the correct information and that information must be current and verifiable. If two factories produce the same tyre model with minor differences in rubber composition or test values, that is content-relevant. One passport text that applies to "the model" while the actual composition differs per factory does not meet what Article 10 requires. For a company with multiple production locations, this means it must be established whether a tyre model from factory A is truly identical to the same model from factory B, or whether it is actually two slightly different products that each deserve their own passport.
When importing from third countries there is an additional role
Anyone importing tyres made outside the EU — often the case with multiple factories in, for example, Southeast Asia — also has to deal with Article 29, which describes the obligations of importers, and with Article 15 on customs controls with regard to the digital product passport. For an importer taking delivery from three factories at the same time, it is relevant that the passport must already be present and verifiable at the time of import, per shipment and per product model. What this concretely means for companies that source from outside the EU is worked out further on What does the digital product passport mean if I import tyres from outside the EU?
Where things go wrong in practice
A number of situations come up repeatedly in practice at companies that source from multiple factories.
One passport for a "product line" that in reality consists of variants. The marketing name of a tyre type suggests one product, but the factories each use their own rubber compound or tread variant. The passport then follows the marketing name instead of the actual technical composition.
Factory supplies data in a different format or language than the other factories. With two or more production locations, often in different countries, technical files arrive in different languages, units or document structures. This makes merging into one correct passport error-prone.
Unclear who is responsible if a factory stops a particular production line. If one of the factories ceases production of a tyre model, the question remains who manages the data for that model and keeps it current for the remaining term of the passport.
Data from a new factory are not compared with the existing data. When expanding to an additional factory for the same model, it is sometimes assumed that the existing passport text can be taken over without amendment, without checking whether the technical data from the new location actually match.
Import data and factory data do not align. On importing tyres from multiple factories outside the EU, customs inspection reveals that the passport does not match the actual origin of the specific shipment, because internal administration does not consistently distinguish between the factories.
What you can record
- An overview per factory of which data they supply themselves and which you supplement, so it is clear where a gap in the data comes from. See What data must I request from my tyre supplier? as a starting point per factory location.
- Contractual agreements with each factory on the supply of passport data, including language, format and time of delivery. How do I document the provision of digital product passport data in my purchasing contract? describes how this is incorporated into a purchase contract.
- A fixed procedure to check whether data from different factories operating under the same tyre name actually match in substance before they are merged into one passport. See How do I check whether my supplier's data is correct?
- An internal list per tyre model with the associated factory location(s), so that when changing suppliers or phasing out a factory, it is clear which passport belongs to it.
- A documented procedure for what happens if a factory stops production of a model: who then manages the data, and how this is determined in relation to the party who is to be able to demonstrate the passport for ten years.
- On import from outside the EU: a link between shipment data and factory origin, so that customs inspections clearly show which passport belongs to which shipment.
This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the legislation that this platform concerns. We do not know your situation. If you are in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.
Written with AI based on the sources above, reviewed by a human on 2026-09-05. Is something incorrect? Let us know — corrections are given priority.