tyrepas.eu

What is a delegated act and why does it determine what I must do?

The Commission is working out the ESPR product group by product group

A delegated act is a legal text that the European Commission adopts to supplement a framework regulation such as the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781), without requiring a full legislative procedure through the European Parliament and the Council. The ESPR itself establishes the principle: products placed on the European market are subject to requirements concerning sustainability and a digital product passport. However, the ESPR describes this for dozens of product groups simultaneously, from textiles to furniture to tyres. Which specific requirements apply to tyres, which data must be included in the passport and from which point onwards it becomes mandatory are not specified in the ESPR itself, but must be worked out for each product group in a separate delegated act. Article 4 of the ESPR gives the Commission the power to adopt those acts, and Article 8 describes what must be included in them at minimum. As long as the delegated act for tyres has not been adopted, the legal basis is missing to determine what a tyre passport must concretely contain and when it becomes mandatory.

Applies to the implementation, not to the principle itself

The distinction is concrete for tyres. The fact that a digital product passport is coming is already established in the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781); that is a regulation and it has direct effect. What is not yet established is the implementation specifically for tyres: which categories within "tyres" are affected, which data must be mandatory in the passport and which threshold values apply to them. This therefore does not apply to the question whether an obligation is coming — that already follows from the ESPR itself — but to the question when and with what precise content that obligation becomes concrete for tyres. Other product groups, such as textiles or furniture, each require their own delegated act, with their own timetable; what has already been established for those product groups says nothing about what will apply to tyres.

No fixed date yet, but a planned timetable

A delegated act for tyres has not yet been published, and therefore the date on which the requirements for tyre passports enter into force is not yet fixed. What is established: the Commission has included in its work plan for the ESPR (2025-2030) when a delegated act is expected for each product group; Article 18 of the ESPR describes how that prioritisation and planning are determined. For tyres, that work plan mentions an expectation for 2027. That is a planning assumption, not a commitment — work plans are adjusted and a delegated act may appear later or earlier than planned. Until the delegated act is actually adopted and published, there are no concrete obligations for tyres under the ESPR. As soon as this happens, this page will be updated with the date.

What to do while the delegated act is not yet in place

The order in which this becomes relevant for a tyre importer, wholesaler or fleet manager is as follows. First: there is nothing to comply with now, because without a delegated act there are no concrete requirements for tyre passports. What is useful is to check which data about your own tyres are already available from the manufacturer or importer — materials, performance, origin — because that is typically the kind of information that ends up in a product passport once the requirements become concrete. Second step: keep an eye on the publication of the delegated act, for example via the ESPR work plan or via a platform that follows this development. Third step: once the delegated act is published, it typically sets out a transition period before the requirements actually apply — that period is specified in the act itself and differs by product group. Until that time, there is no reason to anticipate requirements that have not yet been established, but there is reason to have your own data in order so that the transition, when it comes, is not a surprise.

The legal basis: Articles 4, 8 and 18 of the ESPR

That the Commission may adopt delegated acts follows from Article 4 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781). What such an act must regulate substantively — the requirements for products and for the digital product passport — is set out in Article 8. How the Commission determines which product group is due when, including the planning laid down in the work plan 2025-2030, follows from Article 18. For tyres, a delegated act is envisaged on that basis, but has not yet been adopted.

Those who wish to prepare now would be well advised to collect and keep well-organized the data that the manufacturer or importer already has available on their own tyres, and to follow publication of the delegated act via the official EU sources or via this platform.

What this is based on

The regulation itself is available on EUR-Lex. We provide references per statement; you do not have to take our word for it.

What you must do concretely

What is expected of you

The ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) is a framework regulation. This means that the regulation itself sets out how the system works — who is responsible for what, what a product passport must contain in broad terms, how powers are distributed — but does not lay down concrete requirements per product group. Those concrete requirements come in separate legislation: the delegated acts. For tyres, that act does not yet exist. Article 4 of the ESPR gives the European Commission the power to adopt those acts, and Article 8 describes what must in any case be regulated therein: the product group concerned, which data the passport contains, who may view which data, and from which date the obligation applies.

Understanding that the ESPR itself does not impose tyre-specific requirements

For a company with 10 to 100 employees, it is important to know that reading the ESPR itself is not sufficient to know what will be expected of a tyre in future. The regulation does state that a passport will come into being, and does state what may roughly be included in it, but the precise content — which data, which format, which exceptions — is set out in the delegated act that has yet to be published. Any company wishing to know now which data will be in the passport for tyres will thus encounter a question that can only be definitively answered with that act.

Following when the act for tyres is published

Article 18 of the ESPR regulates the prioritisation and scheduling of product groups: the Commission determines, on the basis of criteria (environmental impact, sales volumes, improvement potential), which product groups are scheduled when. Tyres are on that schedule, but the date on which the act will be published is not yet fixed. It is for a company to monitor that publication, because from that moment the actual obligations and the implementation deadline become known. The question when the product passport becomes mandatory for tyres is therefore directly linked to the publication of this delegated act.

Making a distinction between what is already established and what is still to come

What does follow from the ESPR itself is that a system of digital product passports will come into being, with a QR data carrier and an obligation to keep data available for ten years. What is not yet established is the exact content for tyres specifically. That distinction is relevant for planning within a company: preparations based on the framework regulation (such as checking which data are already available internally) can start now, but actual implementation of a passport awaits the delegated act. Companies wondering what exactly changes for their activities through the ESPR are well advised to keep these two levels — framework regulation and delegated act — separate.

Where things go wrong in practice

A number of misunderstandings recur regularly among companies preparing for the product passport.

An importer reads the ESPR text itself and concludes from it which data will later be mandatory, whereas that list of data is only established in the delegated act. The framework regulation merely indicates the categories that the act must contain, not their content.

A wholesaler schedules its own ICT adjustments on a date that was picked up somewhere as an 'expected implementation date', without checking whether that date comes from an official source. As long as the delegated act is not published, there is no fixed date — only a schedule within the work programme that follows from Article 18.

A company assumes that because other product groups (such as textiles or furniture) already have a delegated act, tyres will automatically follow the same timeline. The order and timing per product group differ, and are not fixed until the Commission publishes the act for that specific group.

A manufacturer invests time in developing a passport structure based on assumptions about what would be "logical" for tyres, without considering the possibility that the delegated act may prescribe a different level of detail or different structure than expected.

A fleet manager assumes that the answer to questions such as whether the product passport also applies to retreaded tyres and tread renewal is already established, whereas this type of boundary question is precisely the kind of specification that belongs in the delegated act itself.

What you can record

  • An internal note with the status: which delegated act for tyres is expected, and where that comes from (the ESPR work programme under Article 18).
  • A fixed review moment (for example quarterly) to check whether the delegated act for tyres has meanwhile been published, with a reference to the official source rather than an intermediary or news report.
  • An overview of which data on own production or imports are already available, so that they do not have to be collected again once the act is published.
  • A list of outstanding questions relevant to the own situation, such as the question whether the product passport also applies to small businesses whether the delimitation of product categories — so that these questions can be directly verified as soon as the text of the act is known.
  • A brief internal explanation of the difference between the ESPR as a framework regulation and the delegated act as an implementing rule, so that there is no impression within the company that all requirements are already fixed.

This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the legislation that this platform concerns. We do not know your situation. If you are in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.

Written with AI based on the sources above, checked by a human on 2026-08-22. Is something incorrect? Let us know — corrections are given priority.